R. Kelly Tried to Discredit Us With Sex Tapes, Fake Letters

  • R. Kelly manufactured a path of proof to discredit witnesses in his intercourse crimes trial, they are saying.
  • Accusers advised jurors that he obsessively recorded their sexual encounters and stored the movies.
  • He additionally made them write faux letters saying they wronged him, a number of accusers testified.

In March 2019, because the partitions closed in on R. Kelly, the R&B singer agreed to an interview with CBS’ Gayle King. He advised the information anchor that his simultaneous sexual relationships with quite a few youthful ladies weren’t a “cult,” however real romance.

“I love ’em, and it’s almost like they’re my girlfriends. We have a relationship,” he advised King. “It’s real. I’ve known guys all my life that have five or six women, OK? So don’t go there on me, OK? ‘Cause that’s the truth.”

For two weeks now, witnesses in R. Kelly’s ongoing intercourse crimes trial have painted a much less charming image. Accusers have described in excruciating element how the singer pursued them, sexually abused them, and stored them in cultlike circumstances the place they obeyed his each whim.

They’ve additionally described how he stored the abuse allegations from popping out for thus lengthy.

According to prosecutors and witnesses, Kelly took meticulous steps to lay down a path of pretend proof to discredit the individuals who would finally take the stand in opposition to him years later.

One means he did this, in accordance to an accuser who glided by “Jane,” was to make his “girlfriends” write faux letters that might incriminate themselves.

“He would make us write letters,” Jane mentioned, including: “He said that these were basically letters that would never see the light of day and that they were to basically exploit us to protect him.”

Kelly made his ‘girlfriends’ lie in letters, accusers say

Kelly instructed his girlfriends to write the faux letters primarily based on his legal professional’s recommendation and “because of his past,” Jane testified. Kelly was tried on youngster pornography costs in 2009, and though he was acquitted at trial, accusations of sexual misconduct dogged him afterward.

She mentioned Kelly made her and different accusers write “four to five” letters every, through which they’d make false confessions, beg for his forgiveness, and ask that he enable them to stay in his life. Another individual in Kelly’s circle would have a look at their signatures and test that they match those on their driver’s licenses, she mentioned.

“He wanted us to include letters saying that we had stolen money from him, that we had stolen watches from him, that we had been molested by family members, that we had been abused and neglected by family members and so forth,” Jane testified.

r kelly trial jane deveraux cannick

Jane Doe #5 is cross examined by Kelly’s protection legal professional, Deveraux Cannick.

REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Kelly would do the same factor with movies, Jane mentioned. If Jane had damaged one among Kelly’s weird guidelines — like not calling him “daddy,” utilizing the lavatory with out his permission, or a person — he would spank her as a “chastisement” after which “make videos as punishments” utilizing an iPad, she mentioned.

“There was an incident where after he had chastised me over 15 times, he had pulled out an iPad and he told me to make a video saying that my father had molested me,” Jane mentioned.

On one other event, Kelly pressured her to eat feces on video, Jane testified.

“He told me to smear it in my face and what to exactly say and to put it in my mouth and act like I liked, enjoyed that,” she mentioned.

Accusers mentioned Kelly obsessively recorded movies of their sexual encounters

Kelly — whose actual title is Robert Sylvester Kelly — is on trial in federal courtroom in Brooklyn for quite a few intercourse crimes.

In an uncommon transfer, the costs prosecutors introduced in June 2019 have been a part of indictments for racketeering. Prosecutors say Kelly ran a felony enterprise the place he directed workers to procure ladies for intercourse, after which pressured these ladies to do his bidding. Kelly has pleaded not responsible to all the costs in opposition to him.

Accusers who testified within the trial up to now say Kelly took movies of sexual encounters. Over time, he appeared to turn into more and more obsessive about the recordings, in accordance to their testimonies.

A lady who mentioned Kelly sexually assaulted her round a half-dozen instances in 1994 mentioned Kelly took movies of simply two encounters. By the 2010s, accusers mentioned Kelly stored up to six iPads in a backpack he carried round with him in all places and set them up on tripods to document intercourse.

Prosecutors wearing facemasks push a cart with white cardboard boxes of evidence along a sidewalk

Prosecutors push a cart with paperwork associated to R. Kelly’s trial as they arrive to Brooklyn federal courtroom in New York, U.S., August 18, 2021.

REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

None of the accusers have testified that Kelly explicitly threatened to launch the movies as retaliation in the event that they spoke out in opposition to him. But it’s clear that their existence influenced their actions.

One accuser who testified beneath the title “Stephanie” mentioned she had a 6-month-long sexual relationship with Kelly in 1999, when she was 17 years outdated. She mentioned that, after she had already determined to steer clear of the singer, she met with him a number of instances in a failed effort to persuade him to destroy tapes he made.

A person who mentioned Kelly sexually assaulted him years later, testifying beneath the title “Louis,” additionally expressed nervousness over the recordings Kelly made. He mentioned he tried to bribe one other one among Kelly’s accusers, believing she might possess recordings Kelly manufactured from the 2 males and fearing these recordings might come to gentle if she testified about him.

While Kelly might haven’t threatened to launch the movies, he did threaten to publish compromising pictures, one accuser testified on Wednesday. In response to a lawsuit the lady filed in opposition to Kelly, she obtained a letter again from him that threatened to publicize particulars of her intercourse life and included nude pictures of her.

“Counter actions are in the early stages and due to be released soon,” the letter from Kelly learn.

The singer took cautious steps to undermine accusers’ credibility

Former workers have testified about Kelly’s weird administration ways. If an worker broke a rule of his or did not meet his requirements, he’d typically dock pay. Former workers mentioned he’d additionally typically have them write histrionic apology letters that described how they supposedly wronged him. Several of these former workers have testified within the trial, describing how he confined ladies in rooms and managed the lives of individuals round him.

Accusers say Kelly made them write false letters to “protect” him. Louis testified that Kelly insisted he write one saying that somebody tried to bribe him into admitting they’d a gay relationship, slightly than telling the reality.

“He gave me the notepad and I wrote the letter,” Louis testified. “He told me word for word what to say.”

louis r kelly trial

John Doe “Louis” testifies.

REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Louis mentioned a detailed buddy of his — one other man who he mentioned Kelly sexually assaulted — advised him that Kelly instructed him to write the same letter.

Kelly’s protection attorneys up to now have had restricted success addressing these letters. In cross-examination, his attorneys had Jane learn one in entrance of jurors. But when prosecutors questioned Jane once more, she had the chance to clarify to jurors that these letters have been stuffed with lies Kelly advised her to write. Jane additionally mentioned that if Kelly did not like her letters, he would reject them, bodily abuse her, after which make her write one other one.

Still, undercutting accusers’ credibility is a tactic that has served Kelly nicely earlier than.

Jurors should discover that Kelly is responsible past an inexpensive doubt of the costs in opposition to him. In his earlier youngster pornography trial, he muddied the waters. While Chicago prosecutors charged him in 2002, his attorneys succeeded in delaying the trial till 2008. By that time, none of the women allegedly in those tapes wanted to testify in front of jurors.

r kelly trial lawyers Calvin Scholar, Deveraux Cannick, Nicole Blank Becker Thomas Farinella

The protection desk of Calvin Scholar, Deveraux Cannick, Nicole Blank Becker and Thomas Farinella sit with their consumer R. Kelly.

REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Jurors later told the Chicago Sun-Times that whereas they believed R. Kelly was within the movies, they could not make certain in regards to the identities and ages of the women in them.

By the March 2019 interview with Gayle King, simply two ladies remained residing with Kelly in Chicago’s Trump Tower. 

Jane was one among them, and he or she testified that she lied all through the interview.

Jane defended Kelly, however she did not have a lot of a selection: Kelly was current off digital camera, wanting on as she answered King’s questions.

“He did a cough that he usually does, which everyone knows,” Jane advised jurors, including: “He was just letting us know he was in the room with us.”

Latest Travel News